> I am all for healthy competition, but I'm wondering if > introducing new tags into a different flavor of ColdFusion is a good idea.
I dont think Tags like CF..This .. CF...That...would be of any use... If the above needs to implemented.. it should be upto the developer.. I think CF needs a standard or close similarity to the main stream players and this means CF should be able to perform or scale like any other(Oracle 9iAS, Websphere..) without exceptions. So whatever it takes to get there.. would be the standard... Essentially.. a stronger product/Software.. > In the current economy, when we should be working to > strengthen ColdFusion in the marketplace, I think.. we are on the same page... Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Judith Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:51 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: BlueDragon (was RE: How is CFMX J2EE implemented?) > > I think this will lead > to more confusion, a diversion of the marketshare, and finally, a > weakening of ColdFusion as a platform. People are not going to > just be saying, "Is ColdFusion standard?" But they're going to be > saying "What version of ColdFusion should I use?" There's a > ColdFusion standard -- Allaire created ColdFusion, Macromedia > owns it, that's the standard. Anything else is a parser. > > Judith > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
