We're looking at CF5 right now... My only concern about the Arrowpoint switch is the session state. If we force sticky sessions, we could run into worse load balancing problems. 10% of users can account for 90% of the resources... That's something that a sticky connection wouldn't solve.
-----Original Message----- From: Mike Brunt [mailto:mbrunt@;webapper.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 2:20 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Load balancing Costas, there is a significant difference from CF50 on with regard to high availability, which version of CF will this be deployed on/in front of? Kind Regards - Mike Brunt, CTO Webapper http://www.webapper.com Downey CA Office 562.243.6255 AIM - webappermb "Webapper - Making the NET work" -----Original Message----- From: Costas Piliotis [mailto:cpiliotis@;voyus.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 12:51 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Load balancing Our IT guy here is leaning towards using a Cisco Arrowpoint 7 layer switch... I am of course on the opposite side of the fence and am in favour of ClusterCats... Someone wanna help me make an educated decision on which one would better serve us? Thanks in advance for your guys help... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
