There are, of course many still using Studio 4.5, and an increasing number migrating 
to StudioMX and
Homesite+
There are a couple of features that disappeared with the MX version due to the Adobe 
Lawsuit,
however, many work-arounds have been posted from time to time, and there is an option 
for the hard
core coders to work in a relatively familiar environment, as well as the newbies who 
prefer to work
in a GUI environment.   StudioMX also easily switches back and forth to suit the user, 
and is so
integrated with Flash, Fireworks, Freehand, etc. that more and more are beginning to 
swear by it.
There is a learning curve, and that alone meets with some resistance from the old-line 
coders (like
me) that are accustomed to working in a high production environment and are reluctant 
to take the
Production hit while learning to navigate around in DWMX to get the job done.

It does appear that MM wants to make developers out of designers, and designers out of 
developers,
and in many cases, based on history this is a twain that is having great difficulty 
being met.

My suggestion for those who do only coding, stick with the tools you are familiar with 
and are the
most productive with, but for the ones who are trying to do a mix of design and 
development, and are
more comfortable in a GUI environment, then MX is the way to go.

Sales records show that DWMX is very popular indeed, especially when it can be used in 
a variety of
environments, such as JavaScript, PHP, and others, in addition to ColdFusion.  It is a 
versatile
tool, but does require getting used to.

Just my .02.

=====================================
Douglas White
group Manager
mailto:doug@;samcfug.org
http://www.samcfug.org
=====================================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Root" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: Studio MX


| David Adams wrote:
| > Everyone I know is still using studio and if in a pinch Homesite MX. In
| > our lives we need more simplicity not complexity.
|
| I guess I missed the rest of this thread but I thought I'd chime in with
| my opinion.
|
| I don't like Dreamweaver MX.  We have a Site License for it here at
| Duke, but I simply don't like it.  I don't like the new explorer layout
| that they use.. I much prefer the directories on top and the files down
| below.
|
| I'm still using Studio 4.5 and will probably continue to use it after we
| upgrade to CFMX in the next few weeks.
|
|   - Rick
|
|
| 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Reply via email to