Rick, Yes - and it also adds a big "ick" factor to your code.
-mk -----Original Message----- From: Rick Root [mailto:rroot@;wakeinternet.com] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:38 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Studio MX Mark A. Kruger - CFG wrote: > CF code very poor. It actuallly did this on the validation: > > <cfif #Form.Formname# NEQ ""> > .... validate blah.... > </cfif> > > Notice the rookie use of the pound signs. It made me wonder if CF server > folks were involved in the creation of the CF wizards at all. Hahahahha... isn't that one of the things every one of us has been taught to avoid for performance reasons? =) - Rick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
