/sigh I know Dave. I'm not claiming infinite resources. However, I don't think that becomes a valid "critique-able" point when examining and evaluating a product.
I guess I took offense to the idea that we are any less dedicated, or are plying any fewer resources to ColdFusion because we came out with a new client side tool. I don't reevaluate my use of say, Windows, when Microsoft creates a new video game, etc. I know, that's an extreme example, but it contains the same concept. Jesse Noller Macromedia Server Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwatts@;figleaf.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:23 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: OT? Macromedia Contribute, is it Content Management or not? > > > How is the creation of a new product "moving resources away" > > from ColdFusion? > > If it's not, I'm glad to see that MM now has infinite resources. Woohoo! > > Seriously, anything that MM does comes out of the same bucket o'resources, > so if you have a new product, that takes effort that you could spend on > existing products. That's not to say I think it's a bad idea, it's just > how > things work, as you well know. > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > voice: (202) 797-5496 > fax: (202) 797-5444 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
