I agree using cfsavecontent would slow things down - but would it be significant for most uses? I think not. If it was significant, you could simply just generate the string with one big cfset. The cfsavecontent would be a bit easier to manage, but you could certainly get rid of it.
======================================================================= Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus Yahoo IM : morpheus "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 8:33 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFC output > > > Sorry forgot to answer about performance. I have done any > testing to see what the difference in performance would be > between outputting HTML directly or using cfsavecontent. > However, it is quite obvious using cfsavecontent has more > overhead because you now have two cfoutput calls instead of > one as well as wrapping one of those calls inside a custom tag. > > Matt Liotta ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
