It doesn't matter if it is significant or not. What matters is that what you suggest requires extra effort and has more overhead than outputting directly. You need to show why that extra effort and overhead is worth it.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901 > -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 9:46 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFC output > > I agree using cfsavecontent would slow things down - but would it be > significant for most uses? I think not. If it was significant, you could > simply just generate the string with one big cfset. The cfsavecontent > would be a bit easier to manage, but you could certainly get rid of it. > > ======================================================================= > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc > > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > WWW : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus > Yahoo IM : morpheus > > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 8:33 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: CFC output > > > > > > Sorry forgot to answer about performance. I have done any > > testing to see what the difference in performance would be > > between outputting HTML directly or using cfsavecontent. > > However, it is quite obvious using cfsavecontent has more > > overhead because you now have two cfoutput calls instead of > > one as well as wrapping one of those calls inside a custom tag. > > > > Matt Liotta > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
