I have been playing with using apache mods (with tomcat though, but I assume JRun is the same), and I have it setup so apache handles static pages and graphics while the processing engine only handles putting out the dynamic pages.
I don't know if it helps, but it seems logical that serving static stuff from apache relieves some of the load from the processing engine. my GBP .02 Rob -----Original Message----- From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:18 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Internal webserver vs. Apache on MX for JRun was Re: CFMXJ2ee advantages over CFMX Standalone I've been enjoying this thread immensely, as the support/community for CFMX for J2EE servers is extremely sparse and I've had lots of different questions. I've seen posts on the forums regarding the following question, but have yet to see a reply. What's the advantage of running through a webserver such as Apache versus the web server that's built in to JRun? Mind you, I'm talking about *CFMX FOR JRUN*, not CFMX standalone. I know about the standalone performance differences, but do these same differences exist for JRun? For a relatively low-traffic, internally used site, does it matter if I go into the jrun.xml file and change the port fro 8100 to 80 and just go with that? Thanks, Dave. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
