Hmm. Well, I could use the different indexing methods that Oracle has, it's better implemented transactional support, cursors that don't suck, and the ability to use a language (PL-SQL/Java) that actually works like a real language, unlike the suckage that is T-SQL..
Oh, let's not forget packages. Having SPs organized? Who'd have thunk it? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roberson, Jeff, Mr (Contractor) ACI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:01 pm Subject: RE: WOT: MySQL in the Enterprise > I currently develop in MYSQL, MSSQL, and ORACLE. > > My choice by far is MYSQL because 90% of my work involves data > from other > systems that gets imported and I display on WebPages - or generate > reports.In using MYSQL for 2 years on several projects I have had > no issues at all. > > My Second Choice would be MSSQL (even though it doesn't run on > LINUX :( ) in > 7 years I have had one major issue and that was because I > corrupted the RAID > :) oops! > > I WOULD NEVER recommend ORACLE. It is was too overpriced if you > need the > features go with MSSQL. > It runs horribly with CF. TOAD is a nightmare and things just > don't seem to > work. Although 9i supporting ANSI SQL has made it a little less > hated in my > book. > > Just my opinion. > > Jeff Roberson > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:48 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: WOT: MySQL in the Enterprise > > > Jon wrote: > > for 99% of what I do, mysql handles my needs perfectly. > > 'Course, I'm doing mostly insert, delete, update, select... > > nothing too complicated. I'll be very happy when the next > >version comes out that can do subqueries, though. > > My sentiments exactly. I can't wait for subqueries. And despite the > to-do list on their site that's been pointed out with regard to low > priority for stored procedures, that's out of date. They acknowledge > somewhere in that cavernous site that stored procs are the #1 most > requested feature and are slated for v4.1. I personally don't use 'em > as most of what I write needs to work on anything, so no stored > procs = > no big deal. > > -------------------------------------------- > Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com > -------------------------------------------- > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
