> I don't see how you could compare a well-written > fusebox3 with one that is non-fuseboxed, unless it > is written in some other tight knitted framework > /methodology. The code would speak for itself.
In my opinion, well-written code is always self-documenting - it always speaks for itself. If you think that you can't write CF code well without using Fusebox, I would suggest otherwise. It doesn't even require such a "tight-knitted" framework, in many cases. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
