Hi, Well, obviously, the code is only as good as the developer--no matter what methodology is used. Fusebox can't really help with this issue. The question that really has to be answered is: Does Fusebox enhance a competent developer's effort to produce manageable, well documented code? If your answer (any developer, not you specifically Dave) is "no", you should find or develop a methodology and framework that does.
Also, I agree that in some cases Fusebox is overkill in many ways. Best regards, MW -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you think that you can't write CF code well without using Fusebox, I would suggest otherwise. It doesn't even require such a "tight-knitted" framework, in many cases. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
