Ok, that makes sense. Although if CFMX for J2EE is supposed to be a J2EE app, shouldn't it be J2EE server independant, or at least damn close? No worries though. Can't have the whole world on a platter.
cheers, barneyb > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:59 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CFMX for J2EE on JRun 4 > > > On Wednesday, Feb 26, 2003, at 09:15 US/Pacific, Barney Boisvert wrote: > > Yeah, I found that section in the release notes last night. You'd > > think > > that the CF installer would mention that. > > I believe this is because CFMX for J2EE came out first and worked fine > with JRun 4 because it contained a silent workaround. Then SP1(a) came > out and 'broke' the workaround (because it fixed the problem properly). > The only place to mention that was the SP1(a) notes. > > I may be wrong but that is my take on it unofficially... > > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
