On Wednesday, Feb 26, 2003, at 15:20 US/Pacific, Barney Boisvert wrote: > Ok, that makes sense. Although if CFMX for J2EE is supposed to be a > J2EE > app, shouldn't it be J2EE server independant, or at least damn close? > No > worries though. Can't have the whole world on a platter.
Well, the pure Java version of CFMX for J2EE is app server independent (insofar as a J2EE application is ever app server independent!). With some of the app server specific versions of CFMX for J2EE you get native code components like Verity etc. Note that the "Phase II" pure Java version of CFMX for J2EE is relatively recent (and is the version available on the Mac - and a few of the other downloadable versions including, I think, IBM WebSphere 5 for AIX). Hope that helps explain it? Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
