| you'll see that most of the configuration that I needed to do with CFMX | for J2EE was actually in the J2EE server, not CFMX, and so I was | dealing with specifics of JRun - you can't expect that sort of | functionality to be exposed via CF Admin when it is so app-server | dependent. |
Does this mean that we need a Jrun Admin GUI? possibly linked to the CF Admin page? I still advance the theory that if you want to sell it, you had better make it Admin friendly. Using Government networks as an example, where network priorities are clear and in writing, the programmer/developer is nowhere the top of the access control lists. The server Admins are not programmers, not java programmers, not CF programmers. They are more focused on Security, intrusion prevention, and uptime. For the developer who has a one or two machine "network" with a developer edition installed, it is a no-brainier for him/her to tweak it to the max. In order to get tweaks looked at on a government network, you are talking about weeks to get a minor change implemented. In the event that the tweak fails, or there is a problem with an updater application, you are likely to find your server software removed from the machine with advice to "Use something else" sent to your superior. Macromedia themselves are another example of what I am trying so hard to express. They do not incorporate their own technology on their own servers until long after the product has been in the market place and beta tested by their customers, if then. If full disclosure was adhered to in the documentation, I am quite sure that sales would drop off considerably as large networks, and multi-homed service providers avoid your product , favoring instead one that gives them less problems. Your statement that this represents only 1% of the installations, absolutely does not fly. Perhaps you feel this is not a genuine concern, I am getting that message loud and clear. But if I am forced to develop in PHP, Java or ASP which installed on the server without a hitch, I assure you it is a concern to me. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
