Like Dave, I haven't put it under any huge load, but it do beat it around a fair amount. With 2.0, support for windows is supposed to be pretty much on par with its *nix support, which is, as everybody knows, all but legendary.
barneyb > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 1:15 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Apache on Win2k - WAS: win 2000 professional for web > server? > > > > How well does Apache run on Win 2k? I'm running > > into issues w/ IIS & FTP sites for my virtual > > directories, and I'm hoping that Apache might > > work better for me. > > It seems to work well enough for me - but I'm not putting it > under any load, > either. > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > http://www.figleaf.com/ > voice: (202) 797-5496 > fax: (202) 797-5444 > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
