Benoit - First point, if it's beta, why is it on their production site? Furthermore, it fails some of the most basic requirements (i.e. document validity). Moreover, it doesn't even have alt tags on some images.
Second, Flash, in of itself, may not be bad design or confusing, but it certainly is not good design to bury flashless design under accessibility. Where's the user control? Where is the alternative design? Moreover, it's not good design to force the download of a new plugin. Frankly, it didn't work when I said "no." Moreover, while the organization is better, it's still not good. If the complaint is "there's a lot there," check out IBM.com. Finally, have you tried to get to the gallery without Flash or Javascript? Good luck. I think that everyone appreciates the fact they're trying to move forward, but for a company focused on creating web tools, it should be an example. Frankly, There's no excuse. Mike Wokasch ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
