ouch! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:25 PM Subject: RE: Good Ol' Cold Fusion Performance Question
> Thanks for the insight. This is really helpful. It's pretty amazing that > this stigma continues to dog CF to this day. It is still perceived as a > "designer's platform." One colleague referred to it as "sort of like > Front Page." Heh. > > Thanks again, > Rich > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:05 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Good Ol' Cold Fusion Performance Question > > Rich this is a question that has been aired in various forms many times. > I can give you my experience having used CF seriously since version 1.54 > and having worked for Allaire and MM as a field based Consultant (read > Troubleshooter). My view is very much from a CF angle. > > From a coding standpoint in terms of getting an application coded well > and out of the door nothing has ever bettered CF. The advent of Fusebox > also added the possibility of using a well distributed framework which > we find is greatly in demand in the larger enterprise operations. > Fusebox is moving into other paradigms (PHP, ASP, JSP) etc but it much > more evolved for CF. In my time at Allaire and Macromedia I saw > applications of all sizes. Wherever there were perfomance issues they > always related back to bad coding or dodgy infrastructure. Once these > items were corrected CF was always able to scream. I had two large CF > user clients paranoid that they had lost most of their site users > because stability and system loads were suddenly amazingly better. One > of them was one of the worlds large Auto manufacturers and they had > bloody busy sites. > > So my point of view is that CF Sites coded well in a workable scalable > and understandable framework cannot be beaten from a web application > standpoint and this is historical. > > When you add to that the possibilities before us with the MX Family, all > the rest really do pale IMHO. > > Kind Regards - Mike Brunt > > Original Message ----------------------- > Hello all: > > I'm new to this list but have always been a fan of CF's elegance and > power for years. I am a manager in dev shop and the classic argument > arises when CF comes up: can CF perform on par with jsp? Php? Asp? .net? > > > Is there anything out there in terms of a comparative study of some sort > that lays it all out? My guess is that it will be slower than Jsp since > its in effect a layer on top of java (so is JSP I suppose, but I'm > guessing its closer to Java than CF is, someone correct me if I'm wrong > here). > > I'd be glad to present to case for future technology decisions where I'm > at, but I don't feel like I have the ammunition. Anyone? > > Thanks, > Rich > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
