Sean,

Ahh, you and I are in the same shoes then on loving DW, I've been using DW
since 1, and for CF dev since MX.

I guess I was mostly curious about some of the gaps between CF Studio and
MX, such as Snippet Shortcuts, divided file/folder browsing, filepath in the
title bar and so forth.

I really enjoy working in DW, and don't find it impedes me at all, though
the three things I mentioned are pretty significant shortcomings.

Even so much as that I'm currently working on an app to leverage Design
Notes (.mno) and .bak/.lck files to do some neat things for poor man's
source control with CFMX...

- Calvin


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: Homesite + question


> On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 08:05 US/Pacific, Calvin Ward wrote:
> > Does your team use DWMX? I noticed you mentioned it a few times in your
> > coding guidelines.
>
> Yes, for the most part my team uses DWMX. I think there's a couple of
> diehard CF Studio fans (although one just switched to a Mac so I expect
> he'll be using DWMX from now on!).
>
> > If so, did anyone develop anything cool to emulate Homesite
> > productivity?
>
> We find DWMX to be a very productive tool! There's some settings tweaks
> you can do to improve performance and turn it into a (fairly) sleek
> coding environment - various have documented them in blogs and on
> websites (I've linked to a few of them from my blog in the past).
>
> If you're working with Web Services, the wizard in DWMX can be very
> useful. Once you get used to how site management works, that can really
> help you be productive - I often have multiple sites set up on the same
> 'local' site tree so that I can manage code with CVS outside any 'live'
> install and then 'put' the code to a variety of different installations
> for testing (e.g., I have five installs of different versions of CFMX
> for J2EE on Tomcat but one source code tree - I use DW sites to push
> code to different CFMX installs for testing).
>
> Of course, I'm a bit biased because I used DW back in v2 (it was 'OK'
> back then) and I loved v3 and v4. I tried using CFS4.5 and hated it so
> I went back to DW4 and now I've been using DWMX since it was in early
> beta ages ago.
>
> Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to