On Monday, Jul 14, 2003, at 20:37 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote: > Interesting.. didnt know Hal Helms and group were working on another > Framework Project.
They've just about finished Fusebox 4 (an evolution from Fusebox 3 but a fairly radical one in my opinion) and Mach II is now in beta - note that the primary architect of Mach II is Ben Edwards. His connection to Fusebox is that he created the J2EE version of Fusebox 3. >> Interesting... looks a lot like Mach II (nee Fusebox MX). > I havent looked deep into Fusebox MX, its still in beta. Honestly, > didnt quite understand the whole idea of Circuits/Parsed files etc. You're confusing Mach II with Fusebox 4. Mach II doesn't have circuits or parsed files. Mach II is an MVC-based framework driven by an implicit invocation architecture - using events and listeners. Fusebox 4 OTOH perpetuates fuseactions, fuses, circuits etc. That's why Fusebox MX got renamed to Mach II - there was really no similarity to earlier Fusebox frameworks. > I would rather just use a base Controller/Parser and multiple > Controller helpers.. alot like Jakarta Struts.. Minus some of > the Complexity in Struts. You should look at Mach II. It's less complex than Struts and it's a nice clean CF implementation of MVC. Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
