http://68.32.61.40/DataData/DataMan.cfm

Oh man, I need more sleep, and thanks.

>I must have missed the first message - I never saw the interface before it
>improved.
>
>However you'll need to send another link - you made the same mistake that I
>ALWAYS do: sent a local link to public people.  ;^)
>
>Jim Davis
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chunshen (Don) Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:28 PM
>> To: CF-Talk
>> Subject: Interface Assessment
>> 
>> Thank you very much.  The links are very interesting.  Also, if you
>> wouldn't mind taking another look at URL,
>> http://localhost/datadata/DataMan.cfm
>> to see if the Interface has improved a bit,
>> initially I had the lazy notion that technical people don't care that much
>> about how things look if it's used by themselves (that's what the above
>> URL's intended audiences are) but after giving it another thought I think
>> that notion might be away from truth.  We all like things look nice, good
>> even if I'm ugly :)
>> 
>> 
>> >> >The most popular (or so it seems) right now is UML (Unified Modeling
>> >> >Language).
>> >> Years ago, at BlueCross & BlueShield, I was taught to use Use Case (UC)
>> >> methodology but I guess UML is gaining ground.
>> >> >
>> >> >In UML you start "Top down".  You first assign roles to each
>> >> participating
>> >> >user or system (these are "Actors") and then model, in increasing more
>> >> >detail, how these actors interact.
>> >> Sounds similar to UC.
>> >
>> >I'm not sure if they are different - Use Cases are a MAJOR aspect of UML.
>> I
>> >would bet that the UC you learned is a subset or an ancestor of UML.  UML
>> is
>> >really a flow of many processes - different tools at different phases.
>> Use
>> >Cases are primarily done in the early, discovery phase (Use Cases
>> represent
>> >the possible actions/paths of the actors).
>> >
>> >I was "raised" on Summit-D which is OKAy, but focuses much, much more on
>> >documentation than process.  We claim to use UML at Met, but it's a
>> partial
>> >implementation at best.
>> >
>> >> >I think what you mean by "Interface Assessment" is what we called
>> >> "Usability
>> >> >Inventory" - an after the fact usability review.  These are good if
>> you
>> >> >failed to do usability during the project cycle, but are by their
>> nature
>> >> >attempts to fix something rather than build it correctly the first
>> time.
>> >> I was alerted to a potential project essentially called "XYZ Interface
>> >> Assessment", and this XYZ may very well be a legency
>> system/application.
>> >
>> >It's probably the same thing.  The basic idea is just going through an
>> >existing site/package/tool/whatever and making usability focused
>> comments.
>> >I've heard many different names - but the results are pretty much all the
>> >same.
>> >
>> >> I agree it's never enough to stress the importance of usability through
>> >> project phases.  Probably, application or system may be more
>> >> representative than "site" since the former could cover legency system
>> as
>> >> well.
>> >
>> >More than that - the same (or at least very similair) skills are used in
>> >industrial human factors work as well: where do you put the radio knobs
>> in
>> >car?  What shape should they be?  Where should the doors of a hotel be
>> >located in relation to the front desk?  Pretty much everything you touch
>> has
>> >had (or could damn well use!) usability work done on it.
>> >
>> >One of the better books on the subject is "The Design of Useful Things" -
>> >pretty light reading, but totally engrossing.
>> >
>> >I've got a bunch of my favorite links here:
>> >
>> >http://www.depressedpress.com/DepressedPress/Content/WebDesign/Resources/
>> Ind
>> >ex.cfm
>> >
>> >Jim Davis
>> >
>> >
>> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

Get the mailserver that powers this list at 
http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to