Hi While it may not be much work to convert from FB3 to FB4 I would not encourage this mid project also is FB4 actually out of Beta?
Thanks Kola >> >> In a nutshell, don't waste time with FuseQ. It was a cool concept that >> matured into FB4. >> http://beta.fusebox.org/. >> >> Jeremy Ridout >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jamie Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:12 AM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: Re: FuseQ Documentation? >> >> >> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 07:53:17 -0400, in cf-talk you wrote: >> >> >The architecture is different, so if you want to link you do have to >> >rewrite. Depending on whether you separated the architecture out of >> your >> >fuses, you might or might not have to rewrite your fuses, but you will >> have >> >to rewrite your switches. >> >> The reason I wanted to know about FuseQ is I've got a FB3 site under >> development, and it's done in the MVC sort of way, with a Model, View, >> and Controller directory, and things are separated that way. If I try >> to keep it pretty strictly MVC, where circuits can't call other >> circuits directly, but by way of the Controller, I run into recursive >> <cfmodule> calls, which is miserable in stock FB3. This is what I >> thought FuseQ was made for. >> >> Our architect is quite reluctant to convert from FB3 to FB4 (which I >> understand), but would probably allow FuseQ. >> >> When I had two cfmodules in a row, in a switch, FuseQ worked >> brilliantly, with its AddToQ() function. However, when I got to >> *recursive* calls, it started dying. Can somebody tell me if there is >> a solution to that problem using FuseQ (there must be!)? Does it have >> to do with the StartOfQ() function (which I can't find documentation >> for)? >> >> I realize this is nobody's problem but my own, but the project is >> suffering, and there's got to be a way to do this that won't require >> me to teach myself and the entire team FB4, and do a big rewrite. It >> seems FuseQ is the answer (even though it's unsupported), and I bet >> there's an easy way to do it, but I'm not finding the answer. Anybody >> have it? :O >> >> Thanks, >> Jamie >> >> >If your fuses will stay the same moving from FB3 to FuseQ, then they >> will >> >stay the same moving from FB3 to FB4. Again, you will rewrite your >> >switches. >> > >> >The bigger problem will be breaking out of the Nested Layout model. FB4 >> >doesn't support Nested Layouts natively (and a good thing too). I wrote >> a >> >plugin which will support Nested Layouts for moving old apps in,but it >> still >> >involves a bit of a rewrite. While FuseQ does support Nested Layouts, >> it >> >also gives you the same control with layouts as FB4 (contentvariables), >> the >> >ability to capture discrete bits of display into variables and then >> output >> >them specifically in their own layout. >> > >> >See my presentation from CFUN03 on my site for more info. >> >http://www.shayna.com go to the presentations area. >> > >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 7:43 AM >> >To: CF-Talk >> >Subject: RE: FuseQ Documentation? >> > >> > >> >Sandy >> > >> >>> >> >>> So why rewrite the application in FuseQ? FuseQ will not be supported >> >>> from >> >>> this point forward as all of it is now available in Fusebox 4. If >> >you >> >>> are >> >>> going to rewrite your application from FB3 to something anyways (and >> >>> believe >> >>> me to take advantage of content variables and the ability to link >> >>> fuseactions together you do have to do a rewrite), >> > >> > >> >I wasn't aware that to take advantage of the chaining fuseactions >> >together >> >It would involve a lot more of a re-write. I wrongly had the impression >> >from what little I have read on FuseQ that you could plug in the core >> >file and start chaining fuseaction together. >> > >> > >> > why not just do it in >> >>> FB4? If you have MX a stable core is available now at >> >beta.fusebox.org. >> >>> If >> >>> you have 5, go ahead and play with FuseQ, but know you will move it >> >to >> >>> FB4 >> >>> as soon as the 5 core becomes available. >> > >> >Maybe. We'll see. >> >Thanks anyway. >> > >> >Kola >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
