Thanks for that we realize it, however our belief is that there will be ongoing better 
functionalities and closer coupling between CF and Flash.

Kind Regards - Mike Brunt

Original Message -----------------------
FlashMX works with .NET.

----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Brunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2003 3:45 pm
Subject: RE: Re: CF or .DotNet what do you think?

> It is very true that most websites out there are HTML with fancy 
> stuff like JavaScript/DHTML however as web applications continue 
> their march into replacing legacy enterprise apps that will not be 
> enough.
> We see the integration of CFMX and FlashMX (and MX successors) to 
> be a pivotal issue in Application Server/Environment choice.  .NET 
> does not offer such a logical path to building RIA's.  If we add 
> to that the RAD advantages of ColdFusion, we have no doubts that 
> CF holds sway over .NET for all that we are involved in.
> 
> Kind Regards Mike Brunt
> Original Message -----------------------
> Currently there are things one can do with ASP.net that cannot 
> efficiently be
> done in CF, however for most web development, it has already been 
> shown a number
> of times that same or similar functionality can be done in CF with 
> far less
> lines of code that in ASP.
> 
> True, one does not have to be a C, C# or VB.NET programmer to 
> learn CF.
> 
> All that said, the fact remains that the majority of web sites are 
> mostly plain
> 'ol HTML, with some JavaScript thrown in.   The actual dynamic 
> data driven sites
> have a shorter development time in CF than in .ASP, however, XML 
> handling is
> still a moving target for CF, but they are getting there.
> 
> For the evolving present, however, there seems to be room for a 
> combination of
> all the technologies, including even (gag) java!
> 
> ======================================
> Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway!
> For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
> ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772
> ======================================
> If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eric Creese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:19 PM
> Subject: CF or .DotNet what do you think?
> 
> 
> | A while back I had posed a question about CF vs .DotNet.  Well 
> the discussion
> here is picking up again and want to go to the mat for CF. I know, 
> like it, and
> have built several apps and sites. I have 4  VB developers on 
> staff with limited
> ASP and web development. They of course will probably lean towards 
> .DotNET. One
> who has more ASP experience had to let me know that a real 
> developer would use
> ASP and that CF is for non-developers. Another basically said CF 
> can not provide
> the robustness needed for a full blown App.
> |
> | Well I am asking for this boards feedback on the matter. Your 
> pros and cons
> would be much appreciated for my presentation.
> |
> | Eric
> | 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq

Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to