> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:56 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: (Admin) List upgrades
> 
> > (As an aside - I've never understood the "war" against HTML
> > email/NNTP posts. It seems the perfect solution to me: a
> > text only, non proprietary method for adding truly rish
> > formatting to email? Sounds great to me.)
> 
> Why does mail need truly rich formatting? In my opinion, most doesn't.

But some does - and most folks do expect (as they can in their word
processors) to, at the very least, bold, italicize and underline (things
we mimic badly in email with _underlining_ and BOLDING).

In our situation the ability to set font families (monotype, for
example) would be very nice to offset code examples.

I agree that it's sometimes taken to an ugly extreme (part of my
understanding that 99% of everything is crap) but it definitely is
useful to have some control over formatting - and HTML (specifically
using style sheets) is a very nice way of doing that in text only
environments.

It's never a useful argument to say "I don't see a need for a thing so
it's not needed".  ;^)  At the very least in a world of universal HTML
mail you could set a personal style sheet that stripped all formatting
if that's what you liked.

Jim Davis 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Reply via email to