I've never found that to be the case. Opening and editing documents, yes CFS was faster than DWMX, Find and Replace, I found the performance on par, or in some cases better with DWMX.
I'm about to do some wide scale testing with DWMX 2004 as soon as our 25 licenses arrive, I'll let you know if it is better. - Calvin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 7:55 PM Subject: Re: A Positive for DW2004 > I love the search/replace features of DWMX, but I disagree with this: > > > CFS has nothing on DWMX Find and Replace. > > CFS/Homesite+ is much, much, much faster at actually doing the > search/replace. DWMX is painfully slow. I haven't yet tried 2004, but I > haven't heard as a new feature that the search specifically is at least 10x > faster. > > -Kevin > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
