> I'm all for enhancing performance, but the decision to use these is > definitely architectural and shouldn't be impacted by performance > concerns.
I wholeheartedly agree, Jim. My point of contention was whether or not Sean thought that CFMODULE on CFMX 6.1 using template="" syntax was "slow" because we use custom tags quite a bit here. Our custom tags often in turn call component methods that do all the "heavy lifting," and the custom tags handle the display. CFMODULE directly addresses each custom tag as it is used, it eliminates the "Little Bo Peep" behavior of having to search for the custom tag being called, and it completely eliminates occlusion in shared hosting environments where custom tags may be named the same across different custom tag paths defined in CF Administrator. I just really wanted to hear what Sean had to say about these things because I respect his opinion very much, as I do yours. Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis Member of Team Macromedia Advanced Intensive ColdFusion MX Training ColdFusion MX Master Class: September 22 - 26, 2003 http://www.ColdFusionTraining.com Download CommerceBlocks V2.1 and LoRCAT from http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com The ColdFusion MX Bible is in bookstores now! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:52 AM Subject: RE: So... cfmodule is slow...? > Everything is relative. > > A lot of time was spent, for example, improving the speed of CFCs in MX > 6.1 - so they are much faster than Custom Tags now. But some time was > also spent improving Custom Tags - so they are faster than they've ever > been. > > In general it still seems that in order of speed you see "function", > "CFC", then "Custom Tag" (before MX 6.1 the last two were switched). > > (You can see this easily - just create a "Hello World" function, CFC and > custom tag and run them 1000 times in a GetTickCount()) > > BUT - all of these are running so fast now this should only be a concern > if you're instantiated thousands. > > I'm all for enhancing performance, but the decision to use these is > definitely architectural and shouldn't be impacted by performance > concerns. > > At least in my opinion. ;^) > > Jim Davis > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:47 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: So... cfmodule is slow...? > > > > With all due respect, I beg to differ. In CFMX 6.1, CFMODULE is not > slow > > at > > all when you're using the template="" syntax. > > > > Sean, would you please tell me if you think my statement above is > > incorrect? > > > > Respectfully, > > > > Adam Phillip Churvis > > Member of Team Macromedia > > > > Advanced Intensive ColdFusion MX Training > > ColdFusion MX Master Class: > > September 22 - 26, 2003 > > http://www.ColdFusionTraining.com > > > > Download CommerceBlocks V2.1 and LoRCAT from > > http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com > > > > The ColdFusion MX Bible is in bookstores now! > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Calvin Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 5:10 AM > > Subject: So... cfmodule is slow...? > > > > > > > http://www.corfield.org/coldfusion/coding_standards/performance.html > > > > > > But is it slower than cf_ ? > > > > > > - Calvin > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=i:4:137687 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. http://www.cfhosting.com
