Not sure about the rest of it, but I'll support more prominent cf
resources. :) It's not like there's a lack of material for the
category -- there's 74 titles if you search and they show 10 per page,
so ... wouldn't that be like nearly 10 pages of results like the other
subcategories there like ASP and JSP?


> With the sheer amount of money I funnel into Jeff Bezos'
> Amateur Pilot
> Tuition Fund, hopefully my words will carry some weight.
> Any site where
> I can buy a Gorilla Biscuits CD, Clie stylus refills,
> discontinued
> Dreamcast games and a hardcover copy of "Coraline" in one
> session *and*
> have them delivered in two days is worth trying to improve
> with a little
> more prominent ColdFusion resources :)

> - Jim

> S. Isaac Dealey wrote:

>> Heh... Thanks Jim... You know I'm always too beligerant
>> to be nice. :)
>>
>> > Done, but I said it in a nice way :)
>>
>> > - Jim
>>
>> > S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
>>
>> >> They definately don't belong there... It's funny, I've
>> >> never seen them
>> >> anywhere but in the programming section next to C++
>> >> ...
>> >> (Not popular
>> >> enough to be on the end-cap next to XML for Dummies I
>> >> guess.) But then
>> >> it's been a little while since I've seriously been in
>> >> a
>> >> book store
>> >> looking for CF books.
>> >>
>> >> Though I do think we should complain to Amazon.com for
>> >> not having a
>> >> ColdFusion section on this page:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/4021/ref
>> >> =br
>> >> _bx_c_2_4/002
>> >> -1274419-3838416
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > I don't think it matters, since we all know where
>> >> > they
>> >> > are
>> >> > anyways :-)
>> >>
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: Owens, Howard
>> >> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 6:45 PM
>> >> > To: CF-Talk
>> >> > Subject: RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet
>> >> > Newsgroup
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Speaking of more legitimacy -- what's up with chain
>> >> > bookstores always filing
>> >> > the CF titles under "graphic/web design"?
>> >>
>> >> > I asked an employee of my local Barnes and Nobel the
>> >> > other
>> >> > day and he said
>> >> > this was a corporate decision.
>> >>
>> >> > Personally, it always irks me that CF books aren't
>> >> > in
>> >> > with
>> >> > the programming
>> >> > books.  Maybe we should all start complaining to the
>> >> > chains about this, and
>> >> > MM -- MM should file its own protests. I think.
>> >>
>> >> > H.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> >> > ~~
>> >> > Howard Owens
>> >> > Internet Operations Coordinator
>> >> > Ventura County Star / E.W. Scripps Co.
>> >> > www.venturacountystar.com
>> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > AIM: GoCatGo1956
>> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> >> > ~~
>> >>
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: Dave Hodder [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:38 PM
>> >> >> To: CF-Talk
>> >> >> Subject: Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet
>> >> >> Newsgroup
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jim McAtee wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > There's already a CF newsgroup.  Why the need for
>> >> >> > another?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It's covered in the comp.lang.coldfusion rationale.
>> >> >> Some
>> >> >> of us on the
>> >> >> existing alt.comp.lang.coldfusion group feel a
>> >> >> "proper"
>> >> >> comp.* group
>> >> >> would give ColdFusion more legitimacy, as well as
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> group having
>> >> >> better propagation, longer message retention
>> >> >> periods,
>> >> >> etc.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Dave
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   _____
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [ Todays Threads
>> >> >   _____
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> >> > ~~~
>> >> > ~~~
>> >>
>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> > ~~~
>>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to