- Jim
S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> They definately don't belong there... It's funny, I've never seen them
> anywhere but in the programming section next to C++ ... (Not popular
> enough to be on the end-cap next to XML for Dummies I guess.) But then
> it's been a little while since I've seriously been in a book store
> looking for CF books.
>
> Though I do think we should complain to Amazon.com for not having a
> ColdFusion section on this page:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/4021/ref=br_bx_c_2_4/002
> -1274419-3838416
>
>
>
> > I don't think it matters, since we all know where they are
> > anyways :-)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Owens, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 6:45 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup
>
>
> > Speaking of more legitimacy -- what's up with chain
> > bookstores always filing
> > the CF titles under "graphic/web design"?
>
> > I asked an employee of my local Barnes and Nobel the other
> > day and he said
> > this was a corporate decision.
>
> > Personally, it always irks me that CF books aren't in with
> > the programming
> > books. Maybe we should all start complaining to the
> > chains about this, and
> > MM -- MM should file its own protests. I think.
>
> > H.
>
>
>
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Howard Owens
> > Internet Operations Coordinator
> > Ventura County Star / E.W. Scripps Co.
> > www.venturacountystar.com
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > AIM: GoCatGo1956
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Dave Hodder [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:38 PM
> >> To: CF-Talk
> >> Subject: Re: CFV: comp.lang.coldfusion Usenet Newsgroup
> >>
> >> Jim McAtee wrote:
> >>
> >> > There's already a CF newsgroup. Why the need for
> >> > another?
> >>
> >> It's covered in the comp.lang.coldfusion rationale. Some
> >> of us on the
> >> existing alt.comp.lang.coldfusion group feel a "proper"
> >> comp.* group
> >> would give ColdFusion more legitimacy, as well as the
> >> group having
> >> better propagation, longer message retention periods,
> >> etc.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >> _____
> >>
> >> [ Todays Threads
> > _____
>
>
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
