> I imagine that you're doing something similar to what I was
> doing: a loader program that acts as an abstraction layer, right?
I guess you could call it that, although I haven't done anything that could
really be considered OOP (no classes, no inheiritence).
> However, I'm glad to hear that I'm not the only one trying to hack OO into
> CF and not going the Fusebox route. :)
I don't think Fusebox makes any attempts to be object oriented either, it
simply goes for a modular approach. Not to delve too much OT for the
thread, but have you looked at cfobjects.com?
Regards,
Seth Petry-Johnson
Argo Enterprise and Associates
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
