>
While that is certainly one difference between BlueDragon and
ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
6.1's availability around the corner I think it is now clear that at
least from a CFML perspective, the two application servers are very
similar and will remain that way into the future. Of course, there is a
lot more to a CF application than just CFML and each of the respective
products has functionality that they share and some that they don't. I
think it is important for the CF community to understand these
differences, so their CF applications can be deployed on the best
possible platform for their needs. In some cases that may be ColdFusion
and in other cases it may be BlueDragon, but the point is there is a
choice and BlueDragon's strong showing as of 6.1 just made that choice
a lot harder than it used to be by implemented much of CFMX.
Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
(888) 408-0900 x901
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
