their own way and developed a framework internally they'd have just as
many developers *asking* about it. Wanting examples, articles and
such...and asking if it's a "suggested standard".
I'm not saying there are no negative impacts from selecting one over
another...I just don't think it outweighs the positives and I'd have a
hard time imagining any loss of sales over the decision.
Stace
_____
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 3:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Macromedia.com running on top of Mach II
> I agree with you
> that some people will make assumptions because of what Macromedia
> does in
> practice, and that's a sad fact of life that there's no way around.
>
Which is why Macromedia should have known better and avoided the
situation to begin with. For example, it would take someone of Sean's
ability very little time to produce a framework to meet their needs,
which would allow them to avoid using MachII. It is a simple
cost/benefit analysis, it is cheaper to create an internal framework
than the possible loss of revenue associated with ill will from the
community.
-Matt
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
