> one over another...I just don't think it outweighs the
> positives and I'd have a hard time imagining any loss of
> sales over the decision.
How would you lose a sale? Unless your clients dictate what framework
you work with, they don't know what you code in
Using one framework over another is a coding choice - if you find it
easier to work with Fusebox or MachII, then use them, but if you run
into issue with it as you're developing, then it's because you made that
choice
If each framework did EVERYTHING, then there'd only be one framework, as
it would be ideal for everybody in all situations
The problem with companies which demand a framework is that instead of
hiring an excellent developer who has never used that framework, they'd
rather hire somebody who knows the framework really well, but isn't as
experienced with CF - I've seen job specs where they DEMAND full
knowledge of FuseBox and wouldn't speak to anybody who hadn't used it
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
