> If in this case, MachII was the best solution then the community would
> certainly benefit from understanding why that was the case. If not,
> many will just assume that is the case, which benefits no one except
> for the people behind MachII.
Perhaps Sean needs to make it more clear that his team's decision
should not be considered an endorsement from the company he works for.
Sounds fair enough. I'm sure he will be happy to clarify the situation
when he gets back.
Christian
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
