> screwed up.
No disrepect meant here Christian, but there are a few of us here who
are of the opinion that MM selecting MachII to use on their site is a
glowing endorsement of the framework
It sounds like MM's way of saying "Hey, if you want a HIGH traffic site,
then you should use MachII rather than the others"
As Matt and Michael have said, the framework has code which isn't
required, and using it means that you've got "bloat code" which is going
to slow down the site (a fraction) and cause complications which aren't
necessary
The size of MM with their resources should have allowed them to build
something from scratch which did the job perfectly, had no superfluous
code and was optimized to the hilt would have made a better impression
of the product as your pages would be the best they possibly could,
rather than using MachII's coding/template structure
That's my opinion anyways, and it probably means nothing to MM itself as
Sean and his team have already built the site using MachII, so it's a
moot point
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
