using CFELSEIF in there to bind them all togther.
Both constructs are done as IF statements at the Java level, so you don't
get the 'usual' benefit of a switch construct. CFSWITCH might be faster
(particularly if the _expression_ value is expensive to compute) if the CF
engine uses a temporary variable, but for simple expressions, that might
actually slow things down, because doing that's an extra step to do.
Cheers,
barneyb
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 2:33 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Which is quicker
>
> CFCASE will be a tad quicker
>
> Basically CFIF has to check ALL conditions where CFCASE will
> stop when it finds the correct case.
>
> Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
> Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
> t. 250.920.8830
> e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Macromedia Associate Partner
> www.macromedia.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
> Founder & Director
> www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Parker, Kevin
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 2:29 PM
> Subject: Which is quicker
>
>
> Can I get a little advice on which is quicker or which is
> the preferred way
> of programming - there are 8 items to select from:
>
> CFIF, CFCASE or IIF
>
> TIA!
>
> +++++++++++++++++++
> Kevin Parker
> Web Services Manager
> WorkCover Corporation
>
> p: 08 8233 2548
> e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> w: www.workcover.com
> +++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> **************************************************************
> **********
> This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee only. It may
> contain information that is protected by legislated confidentiality
> and/or is legally privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient you
> are prohibited from disseminating, distributing or copying
> this e-mail.
>
> Any opinion expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be
> that of the
> WorkCover Corporation of South Australia. Although precautions have
> been taken, the sender cannot warrant that this e-mail or any files
> transmitted with it are free of viruses or any other defect.
>
> If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by return e-mail and destroy the original e-mail and any
> copies.
>
> **************************************************************
> **********
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
