situations where 'iif' is useful. It is not as useful as say 'if', but it
was placed inside CFML for a reason. Thus, if you know what you are doing
using iif is in my opinion acceptable practice.
TK
-----Original Message-----
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 6:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Which is quicker
Not always the case, because of it's dynamic evaluation capabilities. And
those same dynamic evaluation capabilities make it a pain to work with in
a
lot of situations.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 2:47 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Which is quicker
>
> I don't know why people don't like iif (immediate if), it is
> as quick as
> cfif and takes only one line. For simple things, like "if x <
> y print true
> else print false", I think using iif makes code shorter
> without sacrificing
> clarity and speed.
>
> If you don't believe iif is fast then I encourage you to
> write a small test
> and see for yourself.
>
> TK
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 5:34 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Which is quicker
>
>
> cfswitch is both quicker and more elegant. The only
> downside is that it
> doesn't handle dynamic values.
>
> Iii() is one of those functions, like evaluate(), usage of which is
> generally discouraged.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Parker, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2004 10:30 a.m.
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Which is quicker
>
> Can I get a little advice on which is quicker or which is
> the preferred
> way
> of programming - there are 8 items to select from:
>
> CFIF, CFCASE or IIF
>
> TIA!
>
> +++++++++++++++++++
> Kevin Parker
> Web Services Manager
> WorkCover Corporation
>
> p: 08 8233 2548
> e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> w: www.workcover.com
> +++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> **************************************************************
> **********
> This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee only. It may
> contain information that is protected by legislated confidentiality
> and/or is legally privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient you
> are prohibited from disseminating, distributing or copying
> this e-mail.
>
> Any opinion expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be
> that of the
> WorkCover Corporation of South Australia. Although precautions have
> been taken, the sender cannot warrant that this e-mail or any files
> transmitted with it are free of viruses or any other defect.
>
> If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by return e-mail and destroy the original e-mail and any
> copies.
>
> **************************************************************
> **********
>
> _____
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
