On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 06:10, Che Vilnonis wrote:
> http://news.com.com/2100-1012_3-5167812.html?tag=st_lh
>
I just have to comment on Flash a bit because I know MM watches the list
and Che open the gate. --- I checked out writting flash code and, I am
sure you have heard this, the naming convention is ridiculous. Stage?
Actor? Wha? Most developers have spent quite a bit of time learing what
object, methods and the like are all about - why come up with a totally
unique language describing things that dont need it?

By the time I figured out Oh the "Stage" is pretty much the "Screen" I
had thrown it away. I understand it's like that because of backwards
compatiablity - and for artisy types, but can you perhaps make a
language pack called "developer" and "artist"? like how you have
"english" and "chinese".

Plus - really - editors should focus more on the code ... who can write
code in a 10 x 10 pixel window?

Those complaints are from every developer I know that has tried Flash.

I realize this is not so much about "Central" or that interesting
article Che posted -  I just had to vent --

> Che Vilnonis
> Application Developer
> Advertising Systems Incorporated
> 8470C Remington Avenue
> Pennsauken, NJ 08110
> p: 856.488.2211
> f: 856.488.1990
> www.asitv.com
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to