> While Stage my seem odd, it doesn't really take that much thought to
> remember the Stage is the Screen. I just don't see this as a big deal.
> ActionScript, especially AS2.0, is very powerful. You should really look
> into it some.
I did look into it some, thats my point. The stage example is just an
example... it gets far worse when you get actors and actions and movies
etc. ActionScript is not powerful enough for me to just trash everything
I have learned an learn a new thing.
Example. _javascript_, Java, C++ -- how different are they? Does CF have
the same concepts and names for things as those languages? How about VB?
C#? yes they do ... ok then theres ActionScript - I am not going to
learn it becuase there are few commonalties, and it's too much of a
pain. I would like to use Flash, it seems like it has potential but
there is no need for me to learn that "Stage" is the same as "Screen"
(again this is several people talking not just me).
It's pretty common knowledge that people learn by drawing from past
knowledge and making parallels between new infomation and old
information -
I'll just wait for flex and see how that one is...
>
> > Plus - really - editors should focus more on the code ... who
> > can write code in a 10 x 10 pixel window?
> >
> > Those complaints are from every developer I know that has tried Flash.
>
> Um, you do know you can resize that window? You can set the IDE to your
> preferences and simply leave as is. That's normally what I do.
Yeah I tried that and it would resize it every now and again with out me
asking, and even though you can resize it it seems like an after thought
to allow code writting - which is where the power is.
Anyway when people go out of their way to make their own editors you
know something is wrong.
--
Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
