That's very strange. While I did find some big differences in CFSCRIPT vs.
CFTAGS in earlier versions of CF, I have not seen such in CFMX. I'm going to
rerun my tests in the latest version to see how they run and also look at the
class files.
A perfect example of a change is that CFIF vs. IIF() in CF5 showed CFIF to be
much faster. In CFMX, they both compiled down to the same Java code and there
was no speed difference.

> > It's been my experience that using CFSCRIPT never provided any significant
> > performance increase in any case.
> >
>
> I disagree.
>
> My tests:
>
> the function queryRandomize() from DRK 4 (or was it 5?), I rewrote it,
> line-by-line (including comments!) and called it queryRandomizeCFML().
>
> 100,000 iterations of each try, randomizing a 1 column query with 20
> rows, time in ms, server is CFMX 6.1 standalone developer, 3 tries:
>
> script  tags
> 14640   26342
> 14718   25983
> 14609   26108
>
>
> -nathan strutz
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to