> IMHO. However the functionality gap between cfscript and cf tags
> negates this to some degreee. In my experience switching back and forth
> between tags and cfscript has yielded some very awkward code. I've
> almost completely stopped using cfscript altogether, simply because of
> the time I lose trying to maintain a logical block of code in one
> paradigm or the other. As always your mileage may vary, products may
> settle during shipping, and objects may be closer than they appear.
I've seen this as well; however in my foray into UDF's I have found that
there is a to build custom functions to "mimic" CF code by handing the
"switch" off to the UDF and then calling it from within a script block.
True, it might be considered reinventing the wheel but it also allows a
continuity of coding and takes advantage of the CFScript improvements. That
would be the theory, at least. I have not had a chance to put this to the
test.
Hatton
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.642 / Virus Database: 410 - Release Date: 3/24/2004
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
