My apologies. In my venting I did blow your statement out of
proportion. However, "OO allows code reuse" does not say "OO does code
reuse better than anything else" or "OO is the only way to accomplish
code reuse." The statement merely illustrates a capability of OO. If
someone made the second and third statements they would, as you point
out, be incorrect.

--
Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On May 28, 2004, at 1:50 PM, Claude Schneegans wrote:

>>> as it is was Claude's choice to
> read "OO allows code reuse" as "OO allows code reuse for the first time
> in the history of mankind."
>
> C'mon, please be honest, this is NOT either what I said.
> But when some one says "OO allows code reuse" it is AT LEAST presented
> as an advantage,
> either because it does it better, OR because other solutions don't
> allow it.
>
> What I say, is that in both cases it is just a false statement.
>
> --
> _______________________________________
> REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
> See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
> (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to