>>*yawn* here we go again -- dancing in semantics land with
>>Matt. Note my use of quotes (I guess not) -- in any event...
>
> The problem with your dancing lesson is that Matt is absolutely correct in
> his insistence on semantic accuracy in this case, because it matters. You're
> stepping on his toes!
A guy can't make a facetious comment on this list anymore without the
semantic police getting their toes crushed :)
Well if the semantics matter.... who owns the patent and/or trademark
for Java, C#?? Cos you see, if someone owns a patent/trademark on
something then that patent/trademark is the very definition of
proprietary in the dictionary. It has little if anything to do with
standards; real, imagined or de-facto.
-- geoff
http://www.daemon.com.au/
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
