Guy Rish wrote:
>I'd bet that it is most specifically that the verbiage is a match.

Everything was an identical match.  Three entire articles and their code
were duplicated precisely to the character (except for the one we
removed, which was missing a line that broke the code).  You've already
seen/heard what I think about this.

I have always taken extra steps to give credit where its due in code
comments, posts, documentation on my site for published tags etc.  I
think most other developers have the integrity to do the same thing,
which overall strengthens the sense of community and identity we all
share as CF developers.  We all benefit tremendously from what is
essentially the charity of our colleagues.

And no, we don't all need a hug about now ;-)

--Matt--
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to