really work (for J2EE ---> Oracle). Even with maintain connection
checked we notice that Oracle still creates multiple sessions.
The workaround we put in place was to make our DB calls through a java
api that could do a much better job of maintaining the connection.
So CF acts contrary to what this voice of authority claims.
-Adam
----- Original Message -----
From: G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:42:21 -0500
Subject: Re: Understanding/Defending Coldfusion connections
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You're right, MS has done a good job of getting the word about .NET
out. As such, we developers are almost obligated to familiarize
ourselves with its capabilities (and shortcomings) so that we can make
the correct tech decisions for ourselves, our companies, our clients,
etc.
"Microsoft" carries such weight that if you're going to recommend a
different solution to a customer, you'd better have solid reasons to
back them up. The fact that .NET is not preceded by "CF" is probably
not going to get it done :)
Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: Ray Champagne
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: Understanding/Defending Coldfusion connections
I'd be very interested in that too. MS certainly has been good at getting
the word out about .NET, and therefore all of our clients are convinced
that they 'need' it. I'd love to have more ways to convince them otherwise.
Ray
http://www.crystalvision.org________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
