have you registered that as a bug?
--
Hugo Ahlenius
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hugo Ahlenius E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project Officer Phone: +46 8 230460
UNEP GRID-Arendal Fax: +46 8 230441
Stockholm Office Mobile: +46 733 467111
WWW: http://www.grida.no
-------------------------------------------------------------
|-----Original Message-----
|From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 21:52
|To: CF-Talk
|Subject: Re: Understanding/Defending Coldfusion connections
|
|Barney,
|
|I agree, that is how I would expect it to work. But alas it doesn't.
|For example a page with 2 procedure calls = two oracle
|sessions. So rather than base it on request or whatnot, we
|open a connection (through our java api) per user and maintain
|one single session per user. If a procedure hasn't been called
|in the specified 'session timeout' then we kill the session.
|
|Although now that I think about, I think we are talking about
|two things... database sessions and connections. Or are we?
|
|-Adam
|
|
|----- Original Message -----
|From: Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:15:08 +0200
|Subject: Re: Understanding/Defending Coldfusion connections
|To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
|
|Adrocknaphobia wrote:
|> Actually, the option to maintain database connections doesnt seem to
|> really work (for J2EE ---> Oracle).
|
|It does for PostgreSQL. Even the bug where the configured
|maximum number of connections was not actually enforced has
|been fixed in 6.1.
|
|Jochem________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
