>> > If I were a betting man, I would bet that CF continues
>> > to
>> > become closer
>> > to pure Java -- this would (potentially) improve
>> > performance and
>> > broaden the acceptance/use of the CF language.
>>
>> I have my doubts. The closer CF comes to pure Java, the
>> more people
>> will ask "why bother when there's Java". In order to
>> stay alive in the
>> market (as with any market) CF has to provide something
>> significant to
>> the customer which they can't get elsewhere.
>>
> Done right, CF doesn't need to give up anything to provide
> optional
> support for strong typing any more than they had to
> sacrifice anything
> to give us CFCs.
I never said it was a logical argument. :) Just that this is the way
the market will perceive further strides toward making CF more like
Java, whether that perception is warranted or not.
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
