> On Jul 15, 2004, at 12:57 PM, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
>>
>> BD.NET uses ADO.NET for all database access. I'm not sure what you
>> mean by going "straight to ODBC".
>
> To connect to an ODBC source using ColdfusionMX you do this:
>
> cfquery -> JDBC -> ODBC
cfquery -> JDBC -> ODBC -> database
That is correct for an ODBC datasource. But if you have a native
JDBC driver it becomes:
cfquery -> JDBC -> database
You can cut out the additional layer. That is why ODBC
datasources should only be used as a last resort.
> Given that .NET is Java-based
It isn't.
> I presume it does something similar.
It can do something similar, but why would you want that? Just
like with CF it would only introduce an additional layer with
additional bugs and additional overhead:
.NET -> ADO.NET -> ODBC -> database
Use the native ADO.NET drivers where available:
.NET -> ADO.NET -> database
Jochem
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
