It would also be worth supporting Quicktime. Apple has a new codec
that supports higher quality video at lower data rates. Steve demoed
it by doing a video chat with 3 concurrent participants displayed on
the screen.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/h264.html
Dick
On Jul 20, 2004, at 3:50 AM, Cutter (CF-Talk) wrote:
> Rick,
>
> I would look into using WM9 as opposed to WM7 (fairly wide
> distribution,
> so it shouldn't be much of a stretch.) MS has full documentation for
> control in the SDK, and an active forum on their developer's site,
> which
> may give you the information you need. If I had a little more time I
> would try to research this for you, but I can tell you from experience
> that the WM9 codec is much better than the WM7 codec, with better
> compression and less loss.
>
> Cutter
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
