> "and cfml list loop is even more efficient than array..."
>
> WOW!... There must be something really wrong with the CFMX Implementation of
> Arrays.
> That is completely backwards to Java Implementation. Bruce Eckel's (Thinking
> in Java)
> compares the Collection Classes and i believe mentions...
>
> There is No Collection to beat "Primitive Java Arrays" Performance.
>
> So what are we dealing with here? Coding backwards? Or We need Primitive
> Data Types in CFMX?
>
CF Arrays are actually java.util.Vector data structures underneath the
hood. Hence, you cannot make an apples to apples comparison with
regard to performance, etc.
Regards,
Dave.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
