Big T, did you get this issue resolved completely?

-Adam

On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:30:09 -0400, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :) thanks!
>
> for all your help.
>
> also, kudos to mike t.  who helped as well!
> later.
> tw
>
>
>
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:18:58 -0400, DURETTE, STEVEN J (AIT)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tony,
> >
> > The only thing I can say to that is run it one way , then run it the other
> > way and see which is faster.
> >
> > There is an article about Query performance here:
> > http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3298411
> > <http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3298411>
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 5:38 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: cfmx - request timeout setting
> >
> > so...
> >
> > does that looping effect buy me anything, or should i just run the
> > whole shebang and not worry about rowcount?
> >
> > i guess my question is...does this help in the deletion process?  help
> > = increased speed/less downtime?
> >
> > thanks!
> > --
> > tony
> >
> > Tony Weeg
> > human.
> > email: tonyweeg [at] gmail [dot] com
> > blog: http://www.revolutionwebdesign.com/blog/
> >
> > Check out http://www.antiwrap.com to send websites to your friends.
> >  _____
> >
> >________________________________
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to