we just got the queries tuned so that it doesnt cause the problem "As Much"
the problem with CFMX spiraling to its death upon a request to a VERY
tied up db, still is there.
:( any ideas?
tw
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:51:27 -0400, Adrocknaphobia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Big T, did you get this issue resolved completely?
>
> -Adam
>
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:30:09 -0400, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > :) thanks!
> >
> > for all your help.
> >
> > also, kudos to mike t. who helped as well!
> > later.
> > tw
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:18:58 -0400, DURETTE, STEVEN J (AIT)
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Tony,
> > >
> > > The only thing I can say to that is run it one way , then run it the other
> > > way and see which is faster.
> > >
> > > There is an article about Query performance here:
> > > http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3298411
> > > <http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3298411>
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 5:38 PM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: Re: cfmx - request timeout setting
> > >
> > > so...
> > >
> > > does that looping effect buy me anything, or should i just run the
> > > whole shebang and not worry about rowcount?
> > >
> > > i guess my question is...does this help in the deletion process? help
> > > = increased speed/less downtime?
> > >
> > > thanks!
> > > --
> > > tony
> > >
> > > Tony Weeg
> > > human.
> > > email: tonyweeg [at] gmail [dot] com
> > > blog: http://www.revolutionwebdesign.com/blog/
> > >
> > > Check out http://www.antiwrap.com to send websites to your friends.
> > > _____
> > >
> > >
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
